99,99% of tracks that people make here including vast amounts of synths and devices ( 500, 1k etc ) usually is only to flex and the track itself is a total garbage. This one right here is utilized perfectly. Once again, very good!
Mar 23, 24
Nothing to do with the ones you mentioned
Mar 23, 24
He's probably not talking about those in particular. Overproducing isn't uncommon. I've done it too :)
Mar 22, 24
You have to think beyond an "audiotooler". Professional and well-made tracks (outside of AT) have a lot of synths and tons of effects, it's not for "flexing", it's because the track was meant to be made good.
Mar 22, 24
@borozo This might be an unpopular opinion, but I disagree. If you're talking about @theclient 's Dystopia (I think the name was it?) It sounds amazing, it shows he put a lot of work into designing these basses. If you're talking about @stoneheart 's "Back to You", even better, these guys took months to produce the track and came out beyond (my) expectations. And to be honest most of these big drafts sound amazing. You might refer to other tracks, but I don't know what you mean.
Mar 21, 24
thank you! the reason there are so many here is that there are about 8 separate ideas compiled into one. individual setups are quite minimal
Mar 19, 24
Mar 19, 24
that is so many 😭
Mar 20, 24
go to my 1k pulvs track
Mar 19, 24
like to the point where you cant even remix it anymore, lets say about 2 GB worth
Mar 19, 24
what he said
Mar 19, 24
needs more to the point where it breaks a school chrome book
these are so pretty
if this gets to 100, pulvgang officially wins
holy shit dude
99,99% of tracks that people make here including vast amounts of synths and devices ( 500, 1k etc ) usually is only to flex and the track itself is a total garbage. This one right here is utilized perfectly. Once again, very good!
that is so many 😭